Rithavo Career

Applied to dozens of roles.
Heard back from none of them?

It's rarely because you're unqualified. Most applications fail for specific, findable reasons — before a recruiter ever really reads them. Rithavo shows you exactly why your application isn't landing, and what to fix, role by role.

Why applications go quiet

Six reasons your resume might be losing before it's read.

01

Weak role alignment

Your resume reads for a different job than the one you're applying to.

02

Vague achievements

Responsibilities are listed, but not what you actually accomplished.

03

Keyword mismatch

Your language doesn't match the language in the job description.

04

Missing evidence

Claims aren't backed by scale, result, or context.

05

Unclear positioning

A reader can't quickly tell your level or your strongest edge.

06

Structural friction

Formatting that makes your resume harder to scan quickly.

We assess these directly against your resume and your target job. We don't make claims about how any specific company's ATS software works internally — no outside service can honestly know that.

Example / Demonstration

What the diagnostic actually looks like.

A sample report, so you know exactly what you're getting. This is not your score — it's a demonstration of the format and depth.

Rithavo Application Diagnostic

Example report — Software Engineer, 4 yrs experience

Overall 72/100
Role Alignment72

Resume emphasizes backend infra work; target JD leads with product-facing feature delivery. Reorder to lead with the latter.

Achievement Strength58

4 of 7 bullets state duties, not outcomes. "Responsible for API migration" — evidence needed: what changed as a result?

Keyword Alignment81

Strong overlap with target JD's core stack. Missing: "distributed systems" — present in your experience, absent from resume text.

Evidence & Impact61

"Led migration" has no stated scope or scale. What size team, what system, what changed as a measurable result?

ATS Structure86

Clean single-column structure, consistent dates. Minor: two non-standard section headers reduce parsing confidence slightly.

Positioning74

Reads accurately as a mid-level IC. Two bullets use "led strategy" language without matching scope — soften or support with detail.

Priority fixes (example)
CriticalRewrite top 3 bullets as outcomes, not duties
HighReorder resume to lead with product-facing work
HighAdd "distributed systems" where genuinely applicable
The methodology

Six dimensions. Our own methodology — not an industry-standard score.

Role AlignmentDoes your resume read like it's for this specific role?
Achievement StrengthAre your bullet points outcomes, or just duties?
Keyword AlignmentDoes your language match the target job description's language?
Evidence & ImpactAre your claims backed by anything concrete?
ATS / StructureIs the document structured so it's easy to parse and scan?
PositioningDoes it communicate your actual level accurately?
Deliverable & pricing

One report. One price. No subscription.

A structured PDF diagnostic: executive summary, full six-dimension scorecard with evidence for every score, and a prioritized action plan.

₹499
Turnaround

24–48 hrs

JD analyzed

1

Format

PDF

Get started

We guarantee your report is factually accurate and genuinely tailored to your specific resume and job description — not a generic template. If it isn't, we'll fix it or refund you.

We do not and cannot guarantee interviews, callbacks, or job offers — no one honestly can.

Find out what's actually wrong —
before application #101.

Get My Application Diagnostic — ₹499